Upside Down Politics in Sri Lanka
A bad election call, but a chance at a more stable two-party system.
Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena dissolved Parliament in late June to consolidate his power and get a stronger mandate for reforms. Big mistake. The Aug. 17 election has provided an opening for former President Mahinda Rajapaksa to relaunch his career and perhaps emerge as Prime Minister.
That would be a strange reprise of the January presidential election. Mr. Rajapaksa called an early poll in the expectation of an easy win, only for Mr. Sirisena to emerge as a serious challenger.
The swings of political fortune reveal how the Sri Lankan public remains ambivalent about the legacy of Mr. Rajapaksa’s two terms. He successfully won the civil war with Tamil insurgents, which earned him enduring loyalty from many in the Sinhalese majority population. But he tarnished his legacy with authoritarian tactics. Critics allege corruption and human-rights abuses, all of which he denies. A United Nations war crimes report is due in September.
The swings of political fortune reveal how the Sri Lankan public remains ambivalent about the legacy of Mr. Rajapaksa’s two terms. He successfully won the civil war with Tamil insurgents, which earned him enduring loyalty from many in the Sinhalese majority population. But he tarnished his legacy with authoritarian tactics. Critics allege corruption and human-rights abuses, all of which he denies. A United Nations war crimes report is due in September.
The swings of political fortune reveal how the Sri Lankan public remains ambivalent about the legacy of Mr. Rajapaksa’s two terms. He successfully won the civil war with Tamil insurgents, which earned him enduring loyalty from many in the Sinhalese majority population. But he tarnished his legacy with authoritarian tactics. Critics allege corruption and human-rights abuses, all of which he denies. A United Nations war crimes report is due in September.
All of this means Mr. Sirisena’s United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) is deeply divided. Unable to enact much of the reform program he promised, the President chose to go back to the voters.
Mr. Rajapaksa’s decision to run for Parliament as a member of the UPFA changed the game. While he claims to support his successor, he differs from the President in many key policy areas.
Mr. Rajapaksa sought closer relations with China during his time as president. Besides allowing Beijing’s submarines to dock in Colombo, he arranged around $5 billion in loans from Chinese banks for local projects. Mr. Sirisena’s coalition has raised questions about some of the deals and is looking to replace as much as 70% of the Chinese loans with money from a more diverse group of lenders. Those close to Mr. Rajapaksa say he will push to continue work under the Chinese contracts if elected.
Mr. Rajapaksa sought closer relations with China during his time as president. Besides allowing Beijing’s submarines to dock in Colombo, he arranged around $5 billion in loans from Chinese banks for local projects. Mr. Sirisena’s coalition has raised questions about some of the deals and is looking to replace as much as 70% of the Chinese loans with money from a more diverse group of lenders. Those close to Mr. Rajapaksa say he will push to continue work under the Chinese contracts if elected.
And while Mr. Rajapaksa has not said as much, supporters say he will try to become Prime Minister in the event of a UPFA-formed government. The irony is that as a result of the pro-legislature reforms Mr. Sirisena was able to pass in the spring, the next Prime Minister will likely be the most powerful in the country’s history.
And while Mr. Rajapaksa has not said as much, supporters say he will try to become Prime Minister in the event of a UPFA-formed government. The irony is that as a result of the pro-legislature reforms Mr. Sirisena was able to pass in the spring, the next Prime Minister will likely be the most powerful in the country’s history.
Although leader of UPFA, Mr. Sirisena appears to have allowed Mr. Rajapaksa a spot on the ballot in order to prevent an even deeper schism. Yet that hasn’t stopped him from speaking out against his former opponent. “Young people will not vote for you due to the big wrongs you committed during your period, your feudal behavior and nepotism,” the President said on July 15. He has also predicted UPFA will be defeated in August because Mr. Rajapaksa’s name is on the ballot.
Although leader of UPFA, Mr. Sirisena appears to have allowed Mr. Rajapaksa a spot on the ballot in order to prevent an even deeper schism. Yet that hasn’t stopped him from speaking out against his former opponent. “Young people will not vote for you due to the big wrongs you committed during your period, your feudal behavior and nepotism,” the President said on July 15. He has also predicted UPFA will be defeated in August because Mr. Rajapaksa’s name is on the ballot.
A UPFA defeat may work in Mr. Sirisena’s favor. Many anti-Rajapaksa members jumped ship to form a coalition with the rival United National Front, the alliance that temporarily allied with Mr. Sirisena in his January presidential run and formed the government that supported his reforms in the spring. A big win for the UNF could mean broader reforms in the future. Sri Lanka’s democracy is in an awkward state now, but a more stable two-party system could emerge.
A UPFA defeat may work in Mr. Sirisena’s favor. Many anti-Rajapaksa members jumped ship to form a coalition with the rival United National Front, the alliance that temporarily allied with Mr. Sirisena in his January presidential run and formed the government that supported his reforms in the spring. A big win for the UNF could mean broader reforms in the future. Sri Lanka’s democracy is in an awkward state now, but a more stable two-party system could emerge. (WSJ)