Relatives of disappeared in Trincomalee will not participate

Missing 2Accusing the Presidential Commission on Missing Persons set up by the previous regime for continuing with its haphazard work under the new government without rectifying any of the concerns raised by civil society activists and those affected, relatives of disappeared people in Trincomalee have in  a letter sent on 28 February said they will not participate in the sessions scheduled by the Commission.

The full text of the letter is as follows:

I wish to convey the decision of those relatives of those who have been forcibly disappeared that we will not be participating in the sessions scheduled by your Commission to take place in Trincomalee on the 28th February to 3rd of March 2015. We have taken this decision for the following reasons:

  1. The relatives of those who have been forcibly disappeared are tired of going before various mechanisms set up by the Government of Sri Lanka from time to time. No results whatsoever have been forthcoming from such inquiries. Many questions have been raised about the terms of reference and capacity of this commission to act on the issue of enforced disappearances. Concerns have been raised previously about the Government’s initiative to issue death certificates for enforced disappearances in parallel to the work of this commission. The line of questioning adopted by the commissioners in past hearings also indicates that the commission is primarily interested in inquiring into the socio-economic support provided to relatives of those forcibly disappeared as opposed to tracing the whereabouts of those who have been made to disappear. The role of the international experts has also not been made clear. Recent reports suggest that one of the international experts so appointed was also hired by the then Sri Lankan Government to advice them on how to handle international community pressure on human rights issues, clearly pointing to a conflict of interest in his appointment as an expert. So far your commission or the Government have not responded adequately to any of these issues.
  1. The expansion of the mandate of the commission in July 2014 on an ad hoc basis giving the commission mandate to investigate other issues other than enforced disappearances doesn’t inspire confidence in your commission. It is indeed our position that all aspects of violations committed during and after the war have to be investigated but this cannot be done haphazardly. The piece-meal expansion of your mandate points to the lack of seriousness of your commission’s work.
  1. The Government of Sri Lanka that took office on the 9th of January 2015 has been campaigning internationally that they will set up a credible domestic mechanism in response to the UN Human Rights Council mandated inquiry into Sri Lanka (OISL). They have sought and received a postponement of the OISL report primarily on this promise of setting up a domestic credible mechanism. However the present Government also seems to continue with the approach adopted by the previous regime towards truth, justice and accountability of which your commission’s continuance is an eminent example. Your commission continues to do its haphazard work under the new government without rectifying any of the concerns raised by civil society activists and those affected. We cannot afford to continue to appear before this commission giving it a stamp of legitimacy. We seek a credible inquiry and we are convinced that this can only be made possible through international means.

For these reasons, with regret, I convey our decision not to appear before your commission’s hearings in Trincomalee.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *