Asylum seeker expulsion plans to be challenged in Supreme Court

Law courtsRights activists have gone to Sri Lanka’s highest court in a bid to stop the government deporting asylum seekers. Sri Lankan rights activists have gone to the country’s highest court in a bid to stop the government deporting Afghan, Iranian and Pakistani asylum seekers.

Lawyer Lakshan Dias said six human rights defenders have petitioned the Supreme Court to challenge the expulsions, which are being carried out despite Sri Lanka being warned it is in breach of its international obligations.

“The case is coming up on September 29,” Mr Dias said.

“We feel that some of the people who are being sent back face real danger. They have life-threatening conditions if they go back. That is why local rights defenders decided to file this case.”

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in a statement on Friday urged Sri Lanka to stop arrests and deportations of those who have filed refugee claims with the agency’s Colombo offices and sought access to those already detained.

Sri Lanka’s Court of Appeal, which is one step lower than the Supreme Court, earlier this month overturned an order suspending the deportations and cleared the way for the authorities to continue expulsions.

The UNHCR said Colombo had initially responded to its appeals and released 71 Pakistanis and two Iranians earlier this month, but 102 people – 38 Pakistanis and 64 Afghans – remained in custody and fresh arrests were taking place.

Between September 3 and 11, 62 Pakistanis and three Iranians had been arrested and 40 of them had already been deported, the UNHCR said.

The refugee agency has maintained the deportations go against the principle of no forced return, or non-refoulement, enshrined in international law.

The agency has also noted that returning an individual to a country where they face the risk of torture was prohibited under the UN’s Convention Against Torture, which Sri Lanka has ratified.

Hundreds of Pakistani Christians and Afghans fleeing persecution in their countries have been arriving in Sri Lanka seeking UNHCR protection.

Sri Lanka earlier defended the action taken against the asylum seekers and said that a state’s responsibility to international obligations had to be “nuanced and balanced in the context of domestic compulsions”.

Sri Lanka’s foreign ministry also accused the UNHCR of processing asylum claims too slowly, and of not taking responsibility for repatriating those whose refugee claims were rejected. (AFP)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

195,375 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>